Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Low Back Pain: Surgery vs. Chiropractic?


 

 
Low back pain (LBP) is the second most common cause of disability in the United

States (US) and a very common reason for lost days at work with an estimated 149

million days of work lost per year. The total cost associated with this is

astronomical at between $100-200 billion/yr, of which 2/3rds are due to

decreased wages and productivity. More than 80% of the population will have an

episode of LBP at some point in their lifetime. The good news is that 95%

recover within two to three months of onset. However, some never recover which

leads to chronic LBP (LBP > 3 months), and 20-44% will have a recurrence of LBP

within one year with lifetime recurrences of up to 85%! What this means is that

most of us have, have had, or will have LBP, and we’ll get it again! So the

question is, what are we going to do about it?

 

Surgery has traditionally been considered a “last resort” with less invasive

approaches recommended first. Chiropractic adjustments and management strategies

have traditionally faired very well when compared to other non-surgical methods

like physical therapy, acupuncture, and massage therapy. But, is there evidence

that by receiving chiropractic treatment, low back surgery can be avoided? Let’s

take a look!

 

A recent study was designed to determine whether or not we could predict those

who would require low back surgery within three years of a job-related back

injury. This is a very important study as back injuries are the most common

occupational injury in the US, and few studies have investigated what, if any,

early predictors of future spine surgery after work-related injury exist. The

study reviewed cases of 1,885 Washington state workers, of which 174 or 9.2% had

low back surgery within three years. The initial predictors of surgery included

high disability scores on questionnaires, greater injury severity, and seeing a

surgeon as the first provider after the injury. Reduced odds of having surgery

included: 1) <35 years old; 2) Females; 3) Hispanics; and 4) those who FIRST saw

a chiropractor. Approximately 43% of workers who first saw a surgeon had surgery

compared to ONLY 1.5% of those who first saw a chiropractor! WOW!!! This study

supports the FACT that IF a low back injured worker first sees a chiropractor

vs. a surgeon, the likelihood of needing surgery in the three years after the

injury would be DRAMATICALLY reduced! In fact, the strongest predictor of

whether an injured worker would undergo surgery was found to be related to who

they saw first after the injury: a surgeon or a chiropractor.

 

If this isn’t enough evidence, another recent study (University of British

Columbia) looked at the safety of spine surgery and reported that (taken from a

group of 942 LBP surgical patients): 1) 87% had at least one documented

complication; 2) 39% of the 87% had to stay longer in the hospital as a result;

3) 10.5% had a complication during the surgery; 4) 73.5% had a post-surgical

complication (which included: 8% delirium, 7% pneumonia, 5% nerve pain, 4.5% had

difficulty swallowing, 3% nerve deterioration, 13.5% wound complication); 5) 14

people died as a surgical complication. Another study showed lower annual

healthcare costs for those receiving chiropractic vs. those who did not. The

“take-home” message is clear: TRY CHIROPRACTIC FIRST!!!

 

We realize you have a choice in who you choose to provide your healthcare

services.  If you, a friend or family member requires care for low back pain, we

sincerely appreciate the trust and confidence shown by choosing our services and

look forward in serving you and your family both presently and in the future.   Visit
www.olsonchiropracticcenter.com for more information.

No comments:

Post a Comment